JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.1 CiteScore 3.5

JMIR Formative Research (JFR, ISSN 2561-326X) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a Journal Impact Factor of 2.1 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 3.5 (2024) JMIR Formative Research is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Access to screening continues to be a barrier for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Primary care-based DR screening could improve access, but operational challenges, such as cost and workflow management, hamper the widespread adoption of retinal camera systems in primary care clinics in the US.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Depression in children is a concerning societal issue, and can be associated with poor academic performance, school dropout and poor overall quality of life. Additionally, child depression is often associated with parallel stress and depression in parents.

|
Article Thumbnail
Early Results in Infodemiology and Infoveillance

The opioid crisis remains a critical public health challenge, with opioid use disorder (OUD) imposing significant societal and healthcare burdens. Online communities, such as the Reddit community r/OpiatesRecovery, provide an anonymous and accessible platform for individuals in recovery. Despite the increasing use of Reddit for substance use research, limited studies have explored the content and interactions of self-disclosure and social support within these communities.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Advancements in science and technology can exacerbate health disparities, particularly when there is a lack of diversity in clinical research, which limits the benefits of innovations for underrepresented communities. Programs like the All of Us Research Program (AoURP) are actively working to address this issue by ensuring that underrepresented populations are represented in biomedical research, promoting equitable participation, and advancing health outcomes for all. African American communities have been particularly underrepresented in clinical research, often due to historical instances of research misconduct, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which have deeply impacted trust and willingness to participate in research studies. With the US population becoming increasingly diverse, it is crucial that clinical research studies reflect this diversity to improve health outcomes. However, limited data and small sample sizes in qualitative studies on the inclusion of underrepresented groups hinder progress in this area.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Patients often communicate with primary care centres remotely (e.g. by telephone or e-mail) before seeking in-person care. A comparatively novel addition might be patient-facing symptom entry websites, where subsequent questions are automatically guided by previous responses. However, the acceptability of such systems to healthcare staff remains unclear, particularly in terms of what features staff perceive as useful.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Nigeria has one of the highest child mortality rates globally, with 111 deaths per 1,000 live births. Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) improves infant survival by providing essential nutrients and antibodies that protect against infections and diseases. Despite its benefits, EBF rates in Nigeria remain low at 29%, largely due to limited healthcare support and breastfeeding guidance. With the proliferation of mobile phones in Nigeria, mobile health (mHealth) interventions are being explored as scalable solutions. SMS-based programs have demonstrated success in delivering behavioral interventions, yet few use artificial intelligence (AI) for personalized breastfeeding support.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Preventing and treating methamphetamine-related harm in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations is a significant challenge for health care services. Digital health care may offer opportunities to support individuals and families in ways that complement existing methamphetamine treatment options. This study responds to a community-identified priority as Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs) identified methamphetamine use as a key concern and sought support to respond to the needs of people who use methamphetamine and their families.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Latino caregivers of persons living with dementia (PLWD) face distinct financial challenges, spending nearly half of their annual household income on caregiving expenses, almost twice as much as non-Latino caregivers. Cultural norms, limited access to financial resources, and underrepresentation in intervention research compound this economic burden. There remains a critical gap in evidence-based, culturally tailored programs designed to reduce financial stress among Latino caregivers.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Rural communities face persistent challenges in recruiting and retaining healthcare professionals. Research has shown that individuals from rural backgrounds are more likely to return to practice in these areas, yet most existing pipeline programs focus on undergraduate and medical students rather than high school students. Early exposure to healthcare careers is essential, as many students have already selected their career paths by the time they enter college. A previous study conducted in 2020 analyzed the effects of a single educational workshop at a rural high school in New Hampshire. The results suggested that students had a better understanding of the healthcare field.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Executive function encompasses a set of higher-order cognitive processes, including planning, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control, that are essential for goal-directed behavior. These abilities are adversely affected by age with executive dysfunction ultimately impairing performance on activities of daily living.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The negative consequences of caregiving can be mitigated by providing caregivers with support programs that increase their dementia care skills and provide emotional and tangible support. Web-based technology can increase the availability of evidence-based caregiver interventions. GamePlan4Care (GP4C) is a web-based adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health II (REACH II) intervention, redesigned and reformatted for web-based delivery.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals faced greater mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic than binary-gender heterosexual (non-LGBTQ+) adults. The Together for Wellness/Juntos por Nuestro Bienestar website with free well-being resources, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic with partner input, included LGBTQ+ resources. A pilot evaluation among adults (aged ≥18 years) found engagement with and use of the website 4 to 6 weeks before follow-up was associated with reduced (pretest-posttest) depression. Results for LGBTQ+ participants were not reported.

|

Preprints Open for Peer-Review

We are working in partnership with